Institution service

Detailed QERIS accessibility report

A comprehensive assessment designed for decision-makers, accessibility teams and developers. The report explains the website’s accessibility results in a structured, actionable format without exposing QERIS internal scoring logic.

Report contents

What the detailed report includes

The report combines executive-level interpretation with page-level and technical findings so institutions can understand the current state, prioritize remediation and track improvement over time.

Report structure · QERIS Core Standard 1.0

Executive summaryPages requested and completed, findings by severity, strengths within the tested sample and the top three issues.

Overall QERIS score & gradeThe core score, the grade on the A+ to D scale and measurement confidence, with critical-failure handling and the 90 / 95 / 98 upper-grade requirements.

Five core standardsScores for Perceptual Access (20%), Semantic Structure (24%), Navigation & Control (22%), Comprehension & Language (18%) and Interaction Integrity (16%).

Coverage & confidenceApplicable rules and coverage for each core standard, and the conditions that set measurement confidence.

Depth & parityQERIS Depth (how many rules applied to the website) and parity assurance, a separate check with no weight in the score.

Findings by standardEach failed rule under its core standard: QERIS rule ID, rule, severity and status, affected pages, recorded evidence, why it matters and the recommended remediation.

Rule resultsThe result of all 50 rules: passed, failed, needs review or not applicable.

Remediation planPriorities from severity and cross-page spread, and shared-template fixes that resolve the same barrier on several pages.

Assessment scope & sampleThe six standard page roles, the pages actually assessed, the sample version and its fingerprint.

Framework versionQERIS-GMF 1.0 and the versions of the core standard, rules, sampling, scoring, confidence and reporting used for the result.

Limitations & disclaimerWhat automated testing establishes and what still requires expert human review and testing with users with disabilities.

Cover of the QERIS English sample report for Example Institution, marked synthetic test sample

English sample report · QERIS Core Standard 1.0 · core-en-1

See the detailed QERIS report

The sample is produced by the same report template as every QERIS detailed report: executive summary, score and grade, the five core standards, coverage and confidence, depth and parity, findings by standard with evidence and remediation, rule results, scope and sample, framework version and limitations.

View sample report Download PDF

This is a synthetic demonstration with fictional institution details and test findings. It is not an assessment of a real institution. Reports are provided in English.

Request a report

Get a detailed QERIS report for your website

To request a detailed report, contact the QERIS support team. This service is provided for an appropriate fee determined according to the scope and size of the requested assessment.

No fixed public price is listed; the fee is determined according to the assessment scope and website size.

Email QERIS support

hello@qeris.org

QERIS results are based on automated testing of a defined sample of each institution's public pages, following a published, versioned methodology. Automated testing detects only a subset of accessibility issues and does not replace expert human evaluation or testing with users with disabilities. The absence of detected errors does not mean a site is fully accessible or conformant; scores reflect performance on automatically detectable measures only.